Introduction
The teams in all forms and contexts, from those who participate in sports or social competition, the specific focus of this article, teams and industry teams in the community. In fact, no matter what our individual situation, we are all members and associates in various teams.
The common sense that highly cohesive teams are probably the most successful teams. This is traditionallySports wisdom, and it seems certain that one would expect a very cohesive team performance would probably be more of a team full of discontent, conflict and interference to achieve. However, it is entirely unreasonable to assume that all successful teams are very cohesive in nature and it is obvious exceptions to this rule.
Therefore, the central questions: What exactly is the nature and extent of the relationship, if any, between cohesion and team performance? EFurthermore, that which involved the consequences for athletes, fans, coaches, officials and all others in the sports community? This article tries to address these concerns.
Explaining Cohesion and performance
Cohesion within the team, everything is the union of individuals to form a unified whole over and cooperative. Cohesion is a global measure of group interaction and is on three major factors of interpersonal attraction, defined asto assess the tendency of a person comes a different person in a completely positive, personal commitment to the collective and its goals / objectives and feelings of personal satisfaction and pride for excellence paid and / or affiliate opportunities. If all these three factors are found to be abundant in most of the members of the team, "said the team may therefore be relatively cohesive.
Performance can be defined as a measure ofEffectiveness and efficiency of a particular team and its individual members, in pursuit of defined objectives and goals. The criticism is often that the performance will be measured primarily on the findings, with little attention to internal processes of teams and other, less tangible, but potentially important, the results tend. This point notwithstanding, the relationship between performance and results is a logical and practical if you consider that the reason why form teams in the first place because weYou can set up to achieve certain goals and objectives. To find a negotiated position on this matter, while the team-process is indeed of interest, and you could also argue that the analysis of performance should be more active in understanding the processes of the internal team, is the final result, and must inevitably try to make the decision final and binding upon the success or failure.
The nature of the Cohesion Fund Performance effect
Although there is a core of literature on qualityCF for the money in the sport and recreation, which has the theme has been explored more extensively in the areas of management, leadership and psychology. Many credible studies exist in modern science, with different and conflicting stories emerging issues.
On the one hand, there are some experts that the authorities with enough evidence to suggest that the cohesion and team performance rather think positively related to it. Many other theorists, but excludesthat the cohesion among team members tends productivity, which can directly promote the results of the positive benefits associated with it. On top of all this, there is also a selection of works that promote a mixed and inconclusive approach to the relationship between cohesion and team performance. Ultimately, however, as evidence that a high degree of cohesion of the team may occasionally result of performance and productivity, and that highly cohesive groupsoften the most fun, but can be less productive, it shows the overwhelming weight of research and personal experience that, in general, a positive correlation between cohesion and performance.
The amount of Fund Performance cohesion effect
If we accept that there really is a cohesion effect performance, it requires the actual extent of this correlation to dive a bit 'more. It should be noted that proponents of the rule point out that theirPower depends on a number of unstable factors, the most consistent and distinctive as this are given: the level of interaction between team members, the size of the team and the "reality" of the team. Each of these warrants some discussion in their own right.
First, you should consider the frequency of interaction between team members, held by many as the most important factor. In fact, apart from the inevitable disputes and conflicts, the members most likely that individual teaminteract with each other, which is more cohesive the team for treatment. This is important because cohesion improves performance during exercise, especially if sub-optimal outcomes result from lack of coordination and cooperation among team members. Therefore, the effect of the cohesion-performance is often more clearly in the context of team sports, each individual usually has its own role to play, and the interdependence and the coordination of theseThe effort is essential to achieve high quality results.
The second factor, size of the team, has been shown to have an important influence on the order of several phenomena other teams, so it makes sense that there is an effect on the performance impact of cohesion. Studies have shown that in large teams, cohesion suffers as a rule. This only makes sense that members of larger teams can make it difficult or intimidating, to establish contacts with each other or simply do not havethe time or the opportunity to forge ties with each. In general, then one should expect that the size of the effect of cohesion be greater efficiency in smaller teams and lower in large teams.
Finally, the "reality" he told the team a significant impact on the level of cohesion effect performance. The term "reality" refers to the type of purpose and context, bringing together under one team. The implication is that the "real" team has a history and a weight of overThe interaction that makes his performance effects cohesion tend to a greater amount of teams that are made artificially, including experimental groups or evaluation or short-lived as the team gathered for a single game or tournament will be.
Implications for community activities in sports
Certainly, a high degree of cohesion in the team to do wonders for not 'on the results of the field. It should be noted, however, that all the cohesion of the world canDepriving the lack of technical skills, knowledge compensate, fitness, motivation, or insufficient resources. Of course, consistency among the team members should be encouraged, which is not difficult to achieve if the time and some athletes have the opportunity to meet with their counterparts in the industry and build bonds of mutual trust and respect as in training.
For teams that are lacking in the strong cohesion, the inevitable disappointments and failures that come with the sportParticipation can begin a downward spiral into despair. The reality is that no sport to win all the time. The occasional losing streaks afflicts even the best teams in the most difficult times together and is the true meaning of the word, the glue that holds together a team. Remember, while starch is sometimes the reserves that are losing the exhaust.
Conclusion
As a result of research into the effects of cohesion-performance is generally conceived as the sum of the cohesionthree key factors: the attraction and personal commitment and personal pride in the group. The performance will normally be issued only in relation to "box" of the results. The search leads to more positive views on the subject, with the majority of scientists claim that there was a positive correlation between cohesion and performance, size, said to count more unstable elements: the level of relations between group members, sizeGroup and the "reality" of the group. These communities are involved in sport should seek to facilitate the cohesion of the team, as far as possible, resulting in a significant effect on performance can, and can provide valuable source of comfort and the determination of the team members during the prolonged poor performance and / or instability .
No comments:
Post a Comment